STRATEGY flashcards

Terms in this deck

Memorise: Fee caps?

Fee caps: 3% (releasing club) / 5% (player) / 10% (engaging club)

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Memorise: Max representation agreement?

Max representation agreement: 2 years

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Memorise: Minors?

Minors: exactly 3 international transfer exceptions — (1) parents relocating for non-football reasons, (2) EU/EEA player aged 16–18, (3) club within 50 km of border

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Memorise: Maternity leave?

Maternity leave: minimum 14 weeks, of which at least 8 must be taken after birth

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Memorise: CAS appeal?

CAS appeal: 21 days from notification

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Memorise: Clearing House payment window?

Clearing House payment window: 30 days

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Memorise: Platform upload deadline?

Platform upload deadline: 14 days

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Memorise: Limitation periods?

Limitation periods: 5 years standard / 10 years for minors and match-fixing

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Memorise: FIFA Legal Portal?

FIFA Legal Portal: only accepted channel for disciplinary communications (email is never valid)

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

What is the key fact about: Fee caps?

Key fact: 3% (releasing club) / 5% (player) / 10% (engaging club)

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

What is the key fact about: Max representation agreement?

Key fact: 2 years

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

What is the key fact about: Minors?

Key fact: exactly 3 international transfer exceptions — (1) parents relocating for non-football reasons, (2) EU/EEA player aged 16–18, (3) club within 50 km of border

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

What is the key fact about: Maternity leave?

Key fact: minimum 14 weeks, of which at least 8 must be taken after birth

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

What is the key fact about: CAS appeal?

Key fact: 21 days from notification

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

What is the key fact about: Clearing House payment window?

Key fact: 30 days

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

What is the key fact about: Platform upload deadline?

Key fact: 14 days

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Limitation periods: ___"

5 years standard / 10 years for minors and match-fixing

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "FIFA Legal Portal: ___"

only accepted channel for disciplinary communications (email is never valid)

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Fee caps: ___"

3% (releasing club) / 5% (player) / 10% (engaging club)

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Max representation agreement: ___"

2 years

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Minors: ___"

exactly 3 international transfer exceptions — (1) parents relocating for non-football reasons, (2) EU/EEA player aged 16–18, (3) club within 50 km of border

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Maternity leave: ___"

minimum 14 weeks, of which at least 8 must be taken after birth

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "CAS appeal: ___"

21 days from notification

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Clearing House payment window: ___"

30 days

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Platform upload deadline: ___"

14 days

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Limitation periods: ___"

5 years standard / 10 years for minors and match-fixing

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "FIFA Legal Portal: ___"

only accepted channel for disciplinary communications (email is never valid)

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Fee caps: ___"

3% (releasing club) / 5% (player) / 10% (engaging club)

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Max representation agreement: ___"

2 years

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

Fill in: "Minors: ___"

exactly 3 international transfer exceptions — (1) parents relocating for non-football reasons, (2) EU/EEA player aged 16–18, (3) club within 50 km of border

Exam Strategy - Memorise Items

What is the "Near-miss numeric" distractor pattern?

One number/date/amount off from the correct answer. Example: 14 weeks maternity vs. 8 weeks total, or 5-day deadline vs. 3-day deadline.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Adjacent clause" distractor pattern?

Draw from nearby provision in the same article. Example: Art 18bis (third-party influence) vs. Art 18ter (sell-on permitted) — both about interference, different scope.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Definition boundary" distractor pattern?

Test what falls inside vs. outside a defined term. Example: Is a 'physical performance coach' covered by Definition 28 'coach'? Answer: outside.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Procedural swap" distractor pattern?

Describe a valid procedure that applies to a different context. Example: 'Email acceptable for urgent communications' — that's a different rule than FIFA Legal Portal.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Chamber / body / forum swap" distractor pattern?

Swap the authority that makes the decision. Example: Ethics **investigatory** chamber vs. Ethics **adjudicatory** chamber. DC vs. Tribunal.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "False forbid rationale" distractor pattern?

Forbid an action citing plausible-but-wrong legal basis. Example: Correct = '18ter prohibits sell-ons because they're third-party influence' vs. Wrong = 'Prohibited because clubs cannot benefit financially.'

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Authority / autonomy override" distractor pattern?

Assert a higher party can override a lower party's rights. Example: 'Agent may override if client choice is clearly harmful' — wrong, client autonomy is inviolable.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Finality / first-instance trap" distractor pattern?

Confuse first-instance decisions with final, binding decisions. Example: 'Conviction must be final on appeal' vs. 'First-instance conviction sufficient.'

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Liability scope completeness" distractor pattern?

Overstate or understate who bears liability. Example: 'Agent liable for employees, not contractors' vs. 'Agent liable for employees, contractors, AND representatives' (all 4 are true).

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Sanctions parity / quantum" distractor pattern?

Misquote penalty amount or scope. Example: CA failure first violation = 'Fine + registration ban' vs. 'Fine + 2.5% levy' (levy is second violation only).

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Self-labelling irrelevance" distractor pattern?

Self-label doesn't change regulatory status. Example: 'Scout claim exempts from agent licensing' — wrong, conduct determines status, not what they call themselves.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Dismissal distractors (safeguarding)" distractor pattern?

Wrongly dismiss a safeguarding matter on technicality. Example: 'They are over 18, so not subject to safeguarding' — wrong, safeguarding applies regardless of age.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Legal red herring (lawful option embedded)" distractor pattern?

Include one lawful action among unlawful ones. Candidate over-applies prohibition to similar-looking lawful conduct.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Inverted rationale" distractor pattern?

State rule exists to prevent X when it actually prevents Y. Example: 'EPP limits player movement to inflate salaries' vs. 'EPP ensures fair competition & development rights.'

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Qualifier trap (all vs. some, always vs. sometimes)" distractor pattern?

Change quantifier scope. Example: 'All CPD must be completed before license renewal' vs. 'Some requirements are ongoing after licensing.'

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "Tier / finality precision" distractor pattern?

Confuse tier levels (first CA failure vs. second) or appeal finality. Example: 'Levy applies on second CA failure' vs. 'Levy applies on first failure.'

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

What is the "ERG / definition qualifier trap" distractor pattern?

Quote real ERG objective/definition but add non-official qualifier. Example: 'Ensure young players have **social media exposure** and development' — exposure is aspirational, not official.

Exam Strategy - Distractor Patterns

[Rank 1] What is the "Unlicensed agent eligibility wait" pattern?

Module: FFAR | Key trap: Self-labelling irrelevance — what the agent calls themselves doesn't matter; conduct determines if agent services and licensing required.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 1)

How do you tackle the "Unlicensed agent eligibility wait" pattern?

Tactic: Test conduct against 24-month history requirement and eligibility criteria, not claims.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 1)

[Rank 2] What is the "Weekend deadline calculation" pattern?

Module: Disciplinary | Key trap: Near-miss numeric — 17 days when correct is 21 days, or including/excluding weekends in working-day count.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 2)

How do you tackle the "Weekend deadline calculation" pattern?

Tactic: Count working days only; verify whether weekends/holidays apply; use calendar to calculate.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 2)

[Rank 3] What is the "CPD requirements (all-false format)" pattern?

Module: FFAR | Key trap: Wrong calendar window (Jan–Sep vs. correct period) or wrong accreditation body; qualifier trap on scope.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 3)

How do you tackle the "CPD requirements (all-false format)" pattern?

Tactic: Verify calendar period, accrediting body, and scope (all agents vs. specific types). Test all 4 options before confirming.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 3)

[Rank 4] What is the "ERG age-appropriate progression" pattern?

Module: Ethics | Key trap: ERG definition qualifier trap — real objective + wrong detail. Example: 'social media exposure' added to official objective.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 4)

How do you tackle the "ERG age-appropriate progression" pattern?

Tactic: Memorize exact ERG objectives verbatim; minor qualifier changes are planted distractors.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 4)

[Rank 5] What is the "Third-Party Ownership (TPO) definition" pattern?

Module: RSTP | Key trap: Definition boundary — does investment fund / specific entity fall within TPO scope or outside?

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 5)

How do you tackle the "Third-Party Ownership (TPO) definition" pattern?

Tactic: Test against precise definition scope; use exact article wording, not paraphrase.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 5)

[Rank 6] What is the "Client autonomy violation" pattern?

Module: FFAR | Key trap: Authority override — 'Agent may override if client choice is clearly harmful' is always wrong.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 6)

How do you tackle the "Client autonomy violation" pattern?

Tactic: Client autonomy is inviolable; agent cannot override even with reasonable justification.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 6)

[Rank 7] What is the "Eligibility after sports suspension" pattern?

Module: FFAR | Key trap: Finality trap — does suspension need to be 'final'? Or does first-instance conviction suffice?

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 7)

How do you tackle the "Eligibility after sports suspension" pattern?

Tactic: Check article exactly; first-instance conviction often sufficient; finality not always required.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 7)

[Rank 8] What is the "Eligibility after academy suspension" pattern?

Module: FFAR | Key trap: Scope boundary — does rule apply to all academies or specific types? Verify definition.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 8)

How do you tackle the "Eligibility after academy suspension" pattern?

Tactic: Test against definition of academy and suspension eligibility criteria.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 8)

[Rank 9] What is the "Change of association finals exception" pattern?

Module: Statutes | Key trap: Scope precision — when does finals exception apply? Tier/finality and procedural requirements.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 9)

How do you tackle the "Change of association finals exception" pattern?

Tactic: Verify exact conditions for finals exception; adjacent clause distractors test similar-sounding rules.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 9)

[Rank 10] What is the "RSTP positive interest compensation" pattern?

Module: RSTP | Key trap: Adjacent clause — training compensation vs. solidarity contribution, or compensation triggers confused.

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 10)

How do you tackle the "RSTP positive interest compensation" pattern?

Tactic: Distinguish between compensation triggers; verify which regulation applies (training comp vs. solidarity).

Exam Strategy - Top Patterns (Rank 10)

What is "Single-positive (pick 1)" and how common is it?

Single-positive (pick 1) — most common relative to other formats. Stem signals: "which of the following is correct?"; "what is…?"; "which most accurately describes…?"

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is the main trap in "Single-positive (pick 1)" questions?

Trap: Second-best answer is very close (adjacent clause, near-miss deadline)

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is your tactic for "Single-positive (pick 1)" questions?

Tactic: Eliminate 2 clearly wrong options first; then choose between remaining 2 by finding the exact article phrase

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is "Multi-select (pick exactly 2)" and how common is it?

Multi-select (pick exactly 2) — very common relative to other formats. Stem signals: "which of the following is/are correct?"; sentence-completion with multiple blanks

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is the main trap in "Multi-select (pick exactly 2)" questions?

Trap: Stopping once you find a second answer that feels right

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is your tactic for "Multi-select (pick exactly 2)" questions?

Tactic: Evaluate all 4 options independently; mark each T/F; your answer must match the T/F profile exactly

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is "Multi-select 3+ (pick 3 or all)" and how common is it?

Multi-select 3+ (pick 3 or all) — common relative to other formats. Stem signals: Same as multi-select 2 — you won't know it's a 3-answer question until you evaluate all options

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is the main trap in "Multi-select 3+ (pick 3 or all)" questions?

Trap: Assuming "I found 2 correct" and stopping

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is your tactic for "Multi-select 3+ (pick 3 or all)" questions?

Tactic: If 3 options check out, re-examine the 4th carefully before finalising

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is "All options false (find what is false)" and how common is it?

All options false (find what is false) — uncommon relative to other formats. Stem signals: "which is/are NOT correct?"; "which is/are incorrect?"; "which of the following is false?"

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is the main trap in "All options false (find what is false)" questions?

Trap: Finding one wrong option and moving on — there may be more

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is your tactic for "All options false (find what is false)" questions?

Tactic: Verify all 4 explicitly; don't stop at the first false

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is "Which is false (3 true, 1 false)" and how common is it?

Which is false (3 true, 1 false) — rare relative to other formats. Stem signals: "which one does NOT apply?"; "which is the exception?"; rare inverted format with 3 correct options

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is the main trap in "Which is false (3 true, 1 false)" questions?

Trap: Assuming all 4 options are false because the stem is inverted

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is your tactic for "Which is false (3 true, 1 false)" questions?

Tactic: Read carefully: are 3 true and 1 false? Evaluate each independently

Exam Strategy - Question Formats

What is a "Scenario-based stems" stem?

Definition: Factual narrative describing a situation (agent, club, player action) requiring regulatory application. When: Most common across all modules. Ranges from simple transfer scenarios to complex multi-step disciplinary timelines.. Prevalence: Most common. Study focus: Practice recognizing which regulations apply to factual situations. Key: parse scenario first (who, what, when, jurisdiction), then identify the regulatory question.

Exam Strategy - Stem Types

What is a "Direct-knowledge stems" stem?

Definition: Regulatory requirements or definitions tested without scenario context. 'Which are ongoing requirements?' or 'What describes the definition of...?'. When: Common for definitions, eligibility requirements, CPD conditions, and penalty structures.. Prevalence: Common. Study focus: Memorize exact regulatory language. Distractors test near-miss definitions and boundary cases. Study official definitions verbatim.

Exam Strategy - Stem Types

What is a "Clause-bundle stems" stem?

Definition: Numbered clauses (usually 4-6 items) tested for breach or compliance against a specific article.. When: Testing contract violations (18bis third-party influence), procedural grounds, or safe-recruitment checklists.. Prevalence: Less common. Study focus: Read each clause independently. Test against the article cited in the stem. One lawful option is intentionally embedded. Verify all 4 before answering.

Exam Strategy - Stem Types

What is a "Sentence-completion stems" stem?

Definition: Incomplete requirement statement that must be completed with one or more correct phrases.. When: Testing conditional requirements, definitions with specific numeric/temporal boundaries, or multi-part compliance rules.. Prevalence: Occasional. Study focus: Carefully read the sentence structure. Test each completion for grammatical fit AND regulatory accuracy. Near-miss numbers are common traps.

Exam Strategy - Stem Types

Reality fact: Is "Binary grading means getting half right is worth zero" true?

There is no partial credit. For a question with two correct answers, selecting only one earns 0 marks — same as a blank. You need every correct option selected. There is no negative marking either, so an educated guess has upside. Never leave a question blank.

Exam Strategy - Reality Facts

Reality fact: Is "The exam never tells you how many answers to select" true?

The real exam uses "which of the following is/are correct?" — one word covers 1, 2, 3, or all 4. Practice quizzes show a "Multiple answers" label instead of baking that cue into the stem. You must evaluate every option as a standalone true/false claim, every time.

Exam Strategy - Reality Facts

Step 1: Parse the scenario?

Extract four elements: (a) who is acting (agent, club, player, FIFA body?), (b) what is the action (transfer, representation, termination, investigation?), (c) which jurisdiction layer (national, international, minor?), (d) any time element (during contract, protection period, after deadline?)

Exam Strategy - Approach Steps

Step 2: Read the last sentence?

It defines the question type. "Is/are correct?", "is/are NOT correct?", "complete the sentence", "do any of these clauses breach…?" Each demands a different evaluation strategy.

Exam Strategy - Approach Steps

Step 3: Evaluate each option independently?

Never score options against each other. Ask: "Is this statement true or false on its own?" Write T/F on your blank sheet for all 4 options before selecting.

Exam Strategy - Approach Steps

Step 4: Recall or retrieve??

Can you verify this from memory in under 20 seconds? If yes, recall. If you need the PDF: jump to the right page band, then Ctrl+F with an exact phrase from the stem. Budget 90 seconds max per lookup — if you can't find it, flag and move.

Exam Strategy - Approach Steps

Step 5: Before confirming?

Recheck binary grading — is every selected option definitely correct, and is every unselected option definitely wrong? Only then submit.

Exam Strategy - Approach Steps

Time management tip: Round 1 (aim: 40 min)

Work through all 20. Answer what you know confidently; flag anything uncertain. Target 90 seconds for recalls, 2 min for straightforward single-positives, 3 min for scenarios. Do not exceed 3 min on any single question in Round 1 — flag it.

Exam Strategy - Time Management

Time management tip: Round 2 (remaining ~20 min)

Return only to flagged questions. Now you can invest 3–5 min each on complex scenarios or PDF lookups.

Exam Strategy - Time Management

Time management tip: If you must look up

Jump to page band first, then Ctrl+F with an exact phrase from the stem (not a broad topic word). Budget 90 seconds. If you cannot find it in 90 seconds, make your best selection and move on.

Exam Strategy - Time Management

Time management tip: Final 2 min

Ensure no blanks. An unanswered question earns 0; a guess has a chance. A wrong multi-select still earns 0 — same as blank — so guessing costs nothing.

Exam Strategy - Time Management